Japanese sword sets are completely unique and cannot be found anywhere else in the world. The reason for this is, of course, the different perceptions and conditions of the Japanese people and the country’s unique traditions.
Therefore, it is not easy to understand the principles and laws of the strictly geometric lines accompanying each component of the set. If any detail is not observed, even an inexperienced eye will subconsciously recognize that something is not right…
From a craftsmanship point of view, the creation of each set is an attempt to produce the best that a person is capable of at a given moment.
However, it is important to realize that ABSOLUTE PERFECTION DOES NOT EXIST! Not even in Japan. Only excellent work is possible.
The criteria for evaluating the result of the work done is the so-called FIRST GLANCE. At first glance, no negative detail should catch the experienced eye. If the item passes, it can be said to be excellent.
My teacher himself studies sets from the late 16th century called TENSHO STYLE and brought it to the Czech Republic in 1996.
That is why I also began to learn the principles of this style first. The lessons continue to this day. I consider the sets made in this style to be the best, most perfect, and most beautiful from the 16th to 19th centuries.
Of course, the original military sets from the golden age of swords in the 12th-13th centuries are the cornerstone for understanding and knowing the development of sets as such. Without a thorough study of these treasures, it is impossible to understand the further development of swords.
When manufacturing or repairing a set, it is necessary to study the details and characteristics of the period in which it was created as thoroughly as possible and to work consistently in this way. It is not possible to invent or bend the rules. This also applies to blades. This approach is very important in order to preserve the authenticity and character of the repaired item.
For example the GENDAITO period is characterized by the alternation and addition of details from different historical types to a single set. This creates a hybrid that in fact could not have existed in the given time periods.
Such practices and thinking are not my philosophy. I always strive to adhere strictly to the correct historical principles.